I’m lucky in that I have a modern DSLR with plenty of pixels, so I regularly crop images for a number of reasons. It’s either to increase impact, remove a distraction or change the focal point of an image. Sometime I’ll crop slightly to adjust composition to apply the rule of thirds when I think it will add something or if I got it slightly wrong at the point of shooting.
The example in the course manual showed an individual isolated in very uniform surroundings – a green paddy field. I was racking my brain to think of a subject showing similar isolation and I could think of lots of subjects that would deliver the same sort of impression, but not where I could find one! I was thinking of a lone window on building (interesting building or something in the window as bonus) or something on a skyline that had just two colours – the ground & sky. Nothing like that in my notebook of potential subjects.
The lack of subject got me thinking I should make my own subject, but what? After a shopping trip with my wife we got home and that’s when I saw her new shoes on the dining room floor – perfect!
Right Won
Shooting with a 50mm standard lens to keep distortion as low as possible I set up a single light to the right. A test shot showed the left side to be a little dark; I wanted to create nice even lighting for a uniform background so I used a white reflector to redirect some light back and with a few more test shots changing the angle of the reflector I got the right, even effect I was after.
Once I got the shot I was looking for I used the ‘create virtual copy’ command in Lightroom to make about 6 copies and then started cropping. For some I maintained the aspect of the original – centre framing helped there – and for others I used free hand dimensions. What surprised me was that there were so many options and I ended-up making more copies, all without rotating the image! Clearly rotation isn’t an option for many subjects but for this one I really could have.
Shoes represent a lot of things – travel, movement, exertion, independence, status and more. As a viewer, shoes can tell you about the person wearing them – their job, what they are doing, where they are going or indeed where they’ve been.
With that in mind the position of the shoe in the frame makes quite a difference to how the picture looks. The first crop, above, displays a natural gravity towards the bottom of the frame. While there is only one shoe showing, the other could be lurking near by, just out of shot and especially as it’s the right shoe on display in the bottom left corner. Pointing towards the further corner the shoe also suggests there is a journey to be made, the shoe is free to move on.
However, if we crop in the complete opposite way the shoe all of a sudden it looks lonely and the question begs ‘where is the other shoe?’ It certainly isn’t to the left, where it should be. In addition to the aspect of loss, it also looks boxed in, like it’s trying to escape but can’t and there’s a feeling of claustrophobia about the image.
The two images so far keep the aspect of the original, which of course there is no reason to do when the format is open and dictated by subject as it is here. I decided to try a tall aspect which would be something I wouldn’t normally consider for this type of subject given it’s size, angle and background.
It doesn’t look as out of place as I thought and being close to the edge again, it’s easy to imagine it part of pair once more which makes it less challenging to look at. With the shoe in the centre it suggests space and the horizontal lines in the wood stand out more than in other shots for some reason.
This taller aspect also seems to draw out detail in the shoe, which itself now looks more open that in the other cropped pictures so far which could be down to its placement in the centre.
Taking the opposite approach to the last crop, the one below uses a more ‘panoramic’ view, again with gravity keeping the shoe near the bottom.Oddly (to me at least) the focus shifts from the shoe to the wooden floor even more than the un-cropped shot which clearly has the largest amount of wood. I suspect that this is because in the un-cropped picture the shoe takes centre stage and with it being moved away from dead centre the wood is left to ‘shine’. In the picture above the texture of the natural hard floor shows up much more than in some of the others.
The same can be said of the next image, here shown to the left. What also helps keep the floor present in the picture is the join that now stands out near the centre, again something that hasn’t really come to the fore until this particular crop. With the extra space the shoe now looks like something discarded or cast aside and lucky to be standing up.
I’m really glad I chose to keep the picture simple as it has really made me see (and feel) how changing the aspect of a photograph can significantly change what the viewer thinks about an image. In this case it also helped me focus on the symbolism of the subject which leads me to think that may be further enhanced if the set was B&W instead of colour, though I suspect that may lessen the impact of the floor and re-focus on the shoe in latter shots.
This exercise has taught me a number of lessons:
- Cropping images presents many more opportunities than I expected
- Changing the shape and position of the frame substantially alters the feel and potential meaning of an image
- I really need to get a polarizing filter for my prime lenses – that would have minimised the glare from the floor to the left of the image (and some glare on the shoe)
- The Virtual Copy function in Lightroom is excellent, a neat way to try out multiple ‘looks’!
All this even before I considered rotating the image, which in this case is option available to me that wouldn’t (conventionally) be applied to the example in the course manual!
Below are a few more shots cropped differently: